|
|
How a watery catastrophe shaped a planet
|
|
Most scientists reject the idea of a global flood on Earth yet say they are certain there was a watery cataclysm on Mars so enormous that it carved a 3,500 km long channel that is about 400 km wide and up to 2.5 km deep.
|
Kasei Valles, seen in MOLA elevation data.
Flow was from bottom left to right.
|
Spectacular images from the Red Planet show the mind-boggling scale of this enormous channel known as Kasei Valles. Also, surface pictures beamed back from the Mars Pathfinder craft show what scientists say are sure evidence of flood debris (for example, the image at the top of this email). These features on Mars remind scientists of the Lake Missoula flood in America but on a scale of 10 to 100 times bigger. And this on a planet only about half the diameter of Earth, and one tenth the mass!
|
|
But where did all the water come from?
|
|
In the latest Journal of Creation, Michael Oard discusses the source of the water and the cause of the flood. The consensus is that the water erupted from below ground, from what is being termed ‘chaos regions’. There is no agreement, however, on what triggered such an event (although there are many ideas include meteorite impacts, volcanic or tectonic activity, and so on).
|
|
Little wonder given all this is being interpreted from so far away! ☺
|
|
Meanwhile, here on Earth, there is overwhelming evidence all over the planet of a global Flood. Despite this, most scientists insist a global flood did not happen.
|
|
Keep up to date with the latest creationist discussion!
|
|
You can read Michael Oard’s full article on the Martian floods in the latest issue of the Journal of Creation—an in-depth publication we produce 3 times each year.
|
|
Each 128-page issue is packed with the latest creation research, book reviews, biblical creationist perspectives on recent news stories, and more!
|
|
In the latest issue of the Journal of Creation you can also read:
- About the search for the biblical cities of Sodom and Gomorrah
- A discussion of Homo naledi’s final resting place: death trap? Or burial chamber?
- How there are not enough sedimentary rocks for an old-earth scenario
- About confusion in classifying mammoths
- How Darwinism fosters moral decline
- Letters to the Editor discussing or challenging points from recent Journal papers—with replies from the authors.
- Plus the usual popular BOOK REVIEWS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
• 128 pages • 3 issues/year • No paid advertising • FREE digital access!
• 1 YEAR: $39 • 2 YEARS: $75 • 3 YEARS: $105
|
|
I really appreciate the good work everyone does to bring the Journal of Creation together; I have been a recipient of it now for about a year; and wished I would have known about it years ago!”
|
|
Subscribers: This is NOT a renewal notice.
|
|
You can freely print out or forward these Creation INFObytes or articles from our website to your friends, colleagues, family and even your local media. If you have had this passed on to you and wish to receive Creation INFObytes directly, please click here. If you need to change your email address or other information, or to unsubscribe, please update your profile. You can also subscribe or unsubscribe from our daily email here as well.
|
|
PLEASE DO NOT ‘REPLY’ TO THIS EMAIL. It is only used to send Creation INFObytes. Use the following details.
|
Creation Ministries International—USA contact details:
P: (800) 6161-CMI(264) | E: Click here to email us | M: PO Box 350, Powder Springs, GA 30127
|
|
About Us | CMI Home | What We Believe | Privacy Policy
© 2017 Creation Ministries International
|
|
